TET versus Acadmic Marks for Selection of Teacher
Hi Friends,
See NCTE Notification for TET Marks is Selection Process :
Qualifying marks
(9). A person who scores 60% or more in the TET exam will be considered as TET pass. School managements (Government, local bodies, government aided and unaided)
(a) may consider giving concessions to persons belonging to SC/ST, OBC, differently abled persons, etc., in accordance with their extant reservation policy;
(b) should give weightage to the TET scores in the recruitment process; however, qualifying the TET would not confer a right on any person for recruitment/employment as it is only one of the eligibility criteria for appointment.
Source Link : http://education.nic.in/Elementary/RTE-TET.pdf----------------------------
NCTE Clearl specified weightage of TET Marks in selection of teachers for RTE.
Earlier I see many comments in favour of Acadmic marks (I am not against acadmic OR TET), But I have not seen in Highcourt verdict favouring acadmic marks, not in the rules of UP Edu. Niyamavali which was changed before UPTET, not in NCTE notification.
However common exam ( If, multiple stage then it is more fair to select right candidates) is a good process to provide fair opportunity to all.
If Acadmic marks includes then it should be properly scaled ( it is very very tough to make scaling for each university, board therfore COMMON Exam is good approach) and weightage should be lower to eliminate anything biased against candidates.
0 comments:
Post a Comment